 |
Ultrasound-guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal
system
Autores: Jose L. del Cura
Abstract: Ultrasound (US) has gained importance in musculoskeletal imaging. One of the reasons is that it is the best technique to
guide interventional procedures. These procedures have grown unstoppably. A recent review found more than 80 different
procedures, the vast majority with US guidance. Shoulder pain treatments were the first introduced. They include treatment
of calcific tendinitis, infiltrations of bursa and rotator cuff, joint injections, and nerve blocks. Tendons and fasciae are also
targets of these procedures, including infiltrations, several treatments for tendinosis and fasciitis, trigger finger and palmar
fibromatosis treatment. Musculoskeletal cysts (ganglions and Baker´s) and fluid collections can also be treated with
ultrasound-guided techniques, as well as conditions at joints and nerves. Finally, foreign bodies can be removed also using
US. This article reviews these applications. The list of procedures cannot be exhaustive, given the large number of
procedures and their complexity, but it will serve to give a glimpse of how these techniques can solve specific musculoskeletal
problems.
Key words: Musculoskeletal diseases. Interventional ultrasonography. Tendon injuries. Arthrocentesis. Nerve block. Foreign
bodies.
|
|
English: |
|
| |
|
Introduction: A standardized lexicon of morphology descriptors is essential for interpreting and reporting contrast enhanced
mammography (CEM). This pictorial essay describes representative clinical cases using the first version of the BI-RADS®
lexicon for CEM. Material and methods: Clinical cases, BI-RADS categories 1 to 6 with CEM examination, were eligible. CEM
included low-energy (LE) and high-energy recombined (RC) images. Breast ultrasound (US) findings are also described.
Biopsy histopathology of BI-RADS categories 4, 5, and 6 are reported. The first version of the BI-RADS® lexicon was used
for CEM reading, interpretation, and structured reporting.Results: We performed a detailed imaging morphologic analysis of
all breast characteristics in clinical cases BI-RADS 1 to 6 using the first version of the BI-RADS® lexicon for CEM. We describe normal, benign, or suspected malignant findings on US, LE and RC images of 8 clinical cases. Dense breasts were
detected in 6 (75.0%) of the 8 cases. The presence of mass(es), radial scar, asymmetry, non-mass lesion, and microcalcifications are described. The histopathologic diagnosis in BI-RADS categories 4, 5, and 6 are shown.Conclusion: CEM increased
the diagnostic accuracy in cases with nonconclusive results, suspicious malignant findings, or newly diagnosed breast
cancer with the added value of using the first version of the BI-RADS® lexicon for CEM.
Key words: Contrast enhanced mammography. CEM. BI-RADS categories. Recombined images. Low-energy CEM.
High-energy CEM.
|
|
|